A
a a
Guest
http://www.avertedimagination.com/img_pages/winterrose.html
S
server
Guest
a a <mentalcase@gmail.com> wrote in news:
snip
Go to some other group and post your off topic horseshit.
CCAD, sonny boy.
snip
Go to some other group and post your off topic horseshit.
CCAD, sonny boy.
A
a a
Guest
On Thursday, 29 September 2022 at 13:47:43 UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no active astronomy groups on Usenet left
https://groups.google.com/search/groups?q=astronomy
https://groups.google.com/g/uk.sci.astronomy
is populated by one guy
I have 1,000+ active web links to solar activity studies to discuss.
https://www.codeproject.com/articles/812896/sunspot-surface-calculation-case-study-on-solving
sunspot surface calculation excellent project
I need electronics, sensors to detect X-ray, UV, IR radiation on-the-fly to generate charts, alerts
thank you for your interest
Unfortunately, there is no active astronomy groups on Usenet left
https://groups.google.com/search/groups?q=astronomy
https://groups.google.com/g/uk.sci.astronomy
is populated by one guy
I have 1,000+ active web links to solar activity studies to discuss.
https://www.codeproject.com/articles/812896/sunspot-surface-calculation-case-study-on-solving
sunspot surface calculation excellent project
I need electronics, sensors to detect X-ray, UV, IR radiation on-the-fly to generate charts, alerts
S
server
Guest
a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in news:5574cb04-a459-4afe-8e6f-
6a4df407bf01n@googlegroups.com:
You are also a Usenet total retard, obviously
uk.sci.astronomy
free.uk.science.astronomy
cn.bbs.sci.astronomy
alt.astronomy.solar
alt.astronomy
Now got the fuck away and stay the fuck away, child.
6a4df407bf01n@googlegroups.com:
You are also a Usenet total retard, obviously
uk.sci.astronomy
free.uk.science.astronomy
cn.bbs.sci.astronomy
alt.astronomy.solar
alt.astronomy
Now got the fuck away and stay the fuck away, child.
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, September 29, 2022 at 10:04:56 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
But lack the wit to discuss any of them.
But not for you. You lack the skills to make any kind of useful contribution.
> I need electronics, sensors to detect X-ray, UV, IR radiation on-the-fly to generate charts, alerts.
X-rays from the sun don\'t make it to the bottom of the earth\'s atmosphere. The numbers you post here - and clearly don\'t understand - come from satellites orbiting above the earth\'s atmosphere. The information from those satellites - which carry all the sensors that you seem to think you need to build - is freely available, and likely to be more accurate and much more reliable than anything you could get from anything that you could sling together.
You may want to put together you own circuits around your own sensors, but any \"need\" you feel to do this comes from self-delusion.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
But lack the wit to discuss any of them.
But not for you. You lack the skills to make any kind of useful contribution.
> I need electronics, sensors to detect X-ray, UV, IR radiation on-the-fly to generate charts, alerts.
X-rays from the sun don\'t make it to the bottom of the earth\'s atmosphere. The numbers you post here - and clearly don\'t understand - come from satellites orbiting above the earth\'s atmosphere. The information from those satellites - which carry all the sensors that you seem to think you need to build - is freely available, and likely to be more accurate and much more reliable than anything you could get from anything that you could sling together.
You may want to put together you own circuits around your own sensors, but any \"need\" you feel to do this comes from self-delusion.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
A
a a
Guest
#shutupyoustupiddog
the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
A
a a
Guest
#whocareslowbrainerfromSydney
B
Bertrand Sindri
Guest
a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote:
> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
never reanimates.
Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
electronics design group.
> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
never reanimates.
Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
electronics design group.
A
a a
Guest
#youaregroupheroatelectronics
P
Phil Hobbs
Guest
Bertrand Sindri wrote:
Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
day or so.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
day or so.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
M
Martin Brown
Guest
On 30/09/2022 17:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
And was most likely a spammer or some well known deranged nutter
shouting about Einstein being *WRONG* OFTEN ALL IN CAPITALS.
Please don\'t encourage him to crap in there.
He\'s already hit the long dead uk.sci.astro
s.a.r is moderated so should be quite safe from his spew.
Wolf\'s Zurich sunspot number has been going since 1848 and is more than
adequate for the task. Wolf was a formidable statistician as well as
going onto be director of Bern Observatory.
Chatzisterergos (sp?) extended the time series back a further century by
incorporating all known previously recorded sunspot observations.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.06183.pdf
Wolf was prepared to do some incredibly tedious experiments on practical
statistics including 10000 throws of the finest dice he could find and
dropping a needle on a plate to simulate Monte Carlo experiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Wolf
Ed Jaynes later analysed the Wolf dice data and determined the
systematic defects in the dice that Wolf had originally used. Namely
shifted centre of gravity in relation to the face markings and the die
being cut from a very precisely manufactured rectangular prism.
--
Regards,
Martin Brown
And was most likely a spammer or some well known deranged nutter
shouting about Einstein being *WRONG* OFTEN ALL IN CAPITALS.
Please don\'t encourage him to crap in there.
He\'s already hit the long dead uk.sci.astro
s.a.r is moderated so should be quite safe from his spew.
Wolf\'s Zurich sunspot number has been going since 1848 and is more than
adequate for the task. Wolf was a formidable statistician as well as
going onto be director of Bern Observatory.
Chatzisterergos (sp?) extended the time series back a further century by
incorporating all known previously recorded sunspot observations.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.06183.pdf
Wolf was prepared to do some incredibly tedious experiments on practical
statistics including 10000 throws of the finest dice he could find and
dropping a needle on a plate to simulate Monte Carlo experiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Wolf
Ed Jaynes later analysed the Wolf dice data and determined the
systematic defects in the dice that Wolf had originally used. Namely
shifted centre of gravity in relation to the face markings and the die
being cut from a very precisely manufactured rectangular prism.
--
Regards,
Martin Brown
A
a a
Guest
On Friday, 30 September 2022 at 18:33:54 UTC+2, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Google aquired DejaNews = Usenet and rejected to offer tree-like Usenet hierarchy access so Usenet groups on Google Groups just died since fake search engine
generates fake search results
https://groups.google.com/search?q=astronomy
banning access to high-traffic groups, since no such ranking feature has been implemented
thank you my friend
Google aquired DejaNews = Usenet and rejected to offer tree-like Usenet hierarchy access so Usenet groups on Google Groups just died since fake search engine
generates fake search results
https://groups.google.com/search?q=astronomy
banning access to high-traffic groups, since no such ranking feature has been implemented
A
a a
Guest
On Friday, 30 September 2022 at 19:01:50 UTC+2, Martin Brown wrote:
by measure of volcanic activity on the Sun, measure of volcanic energy ejected by the Sun.
Just look at formula used to calculated number of sunspots.
For the same telescope \"K\" is contant, less than 1.
=====Case 1
Number of sunspots groups = 1
Number of sunspots = 10
=====
R = (10*G + S)*K
10*1 + 10 = 20*K
Case 2
Number of sunspots groups = 2
Number of sunspots in each group = 5
10*2 + 10 = 30*K
But actually, number of sunspots in Case 1 and Case 2 is the same
So I opt for the topological definition of sunspots index, as the sum of the volcanic activity on the Sun, calculating total volcanic energy ejected by every sunspot in total towards the Earth,
since what matters is mass and energy of coronal/coronary plasma ejected toward the Earth ,
since CMEs exactly fluctuate solar activity,
resulting in Short Term Climate Changes
one-month/year Climate Changes
Since pictuire of the Sun is no more 2D
and we can study solar surface activity in 3D
there is no need to calculate number of sunspots, which is fake index, as explained above.
========================The sunspot number is calculated using the simple equation: R = (10*G + S)*K. Where: R = the sunspot number. G = the number of sunspot groups observed.
How do you calculate the nâ¦
edaboard.co.uk
The sunspot number is calculated using the simple equation: R = (10*G + S)*K
Wolf\'s sunspot number is low science, old science fake and should replacedOn 30/09/2022 17:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Bertrand Sindri wrote:
a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
And was most likely a spammer or some well known deranged nutter
shouting about Einstein being *WRONG* OFTEN ALL IN CAPITALS.
And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
never reanimates.
Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
electronics design group.
Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
day or so.
Please don\'t encourage him to crap in there.
He\'s already hit the long dead uk.sci.astro
s.a.r is moderated so should be quite safe from his spew.
Wolf\'s Zurich sunspot number has been going since 1848 and is more than
adequate for the task. Wolf was a formidable statistician as well as
going onto be director of Bern Observatory.
Chatzisterergos (sp?) extended the time series back a further century by
incorporating all known previously recorded sunspot observations.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.06183.pdf
Wolf was prepared to do some incredibly tedious experiments on practical
statistics including 10000 throws of the finest dice he could find and
dropping a needle on a plate to simulate Monte Carlo experiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Wolf
Ed Jaynes later analysed the Wolf dice data and determined the
systematic defects in the dice that Wolf had originally used. Namely
shifted centre of gravity in relation to the face markings and the die
being cut from a very precisely manufactured rectangular prism.
--
Regards,
Martin Brown
by measure of volcanic activity on the Sun, measure of volcanic energy ejected by the Sun.
Just look at formula used to calculated number of sunspots.
For the same telescope \"K\" is contant, less than 1.
=====Case 1
Number of sunspots groups = 1
Number of sunspots = 10
=====
R = (10*G + S)*K
10*1 + 10 = 20*K
Case 2
Number of sunspots groups = 2
Number of sunspots in each group = 5
10*2 + 10 = 30*K
But actually, number of sunspots in Case 1 and Case 2 is the same
So I opt for the topological definition of sunspots index, as the sum of the volcanic activity on the Sun, calculating total volcanic energy ejected by every sunspot in total towards the Earth,
since what matters is mass and energy of coronal/coronary plasma ejected toward the Earth ,
since CMEs exactly fluctuate solar activity,
resulting in Short Term Climate Changes
one-month/year Climate Changes
Since pictuire of the Sun is no more 2D
and we can study solar surface activity in 3D
there is no need to calculate number of sunspots, which is fake index, as explained above.
========================The sunspot number is calculated using the simple equation: R = (10*G + S)*K. Where: R = the sunspot number. G = the number of sunspot groups observed.
How do you calculate the nâ¦
edaboard.co.uk
The sunspot number is calculated using the simple equation: R = (10*G + S)*K
A
a a
Guest
On Friday, 30 September 2022 at 19:01:50 UTC+2, Martin Brown wrote:
https://spaceweather.com/images2022/30sep22/limbactivity.gif
what was studied 100 years ago as a flat, 2D image of the Sun from a telescope, has been today replaced by modern solar lab, Parket solar lab in the space probe.
https://spaceweather.com/images2022/30sep22/limbactivity.gif
On 30/09/2022 17:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Bertrand Sindri wrote:
a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
And was most likely a spammer or some well known deranged nutter
shouting about Einstein being *WRONG* OFTEN ALL IN CAPITALS.
And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
never reanimates.
Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
electronics design group.
Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
day or so.
Please don\'t encourage him to crap in there.
He\'s already hit the long dead uk.sci.astro
s.a.r is moderated so should be quite safe from his spew.
Wolf\'s Zurich sunspot number has been going since 1848 and is more than
adequate for the task. Wolf was a formidable statistician as well as
going onto be director of Bern Observatory.
Chatzisterergos (sp?) extended the time series back a further century by
incorporating all known previously recorded sunspot observations.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.06183.pdf
Wolf was prepared to do some incredibly tedious experiments on practical
statistics including 10000 throws of the finest dice he could find and
dropping a needle on a plate to simulate Monte Carlo experiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Wolf
Ed Jaynes later analysed the Wolf dice data and determined the
systematic defects in the dice that Wolf had originally used. Namely
shifted centre of gravity in relation to the face markings and the die
being cut from a very precisely manufactured rectangular prism.
--
Regards,
Martin Brown
Sun is no more 2D object and solar activity, sunposts should be studied in 3D since modern technology offers trools to study Sun and solar activity in 3D
https://spaceweather.com/images2022/30sep22/limbactivity.gif
what was studied 100 years ago as a flat, 2D image of the Sun from a telescope, has been today replaced by modern solar lab, Parket solar lab in the space probe.
https://spaceweather.com/images2022/30sep22/limbactivity.gif
R
Ricky
Guest
\'til daddy took the T-bird away.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
S
server
Guest
a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in news:06322d25-1f9d-4c71-baa0-
4fe1b00f624cn@googlegroups.com:
snipped retarded baby bullshit...
> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
It matches your mental age.
You are accessing through the web and Google?
Not too bright.
4fe1b00f624cn@googlegroups.com:
snipped retarded baby bullshit...
> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
It matches your mental age.
You are accessing through the web and Google?
Not too bright.
S
server
Guest
Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:th6u3m$1vn1$1@gioia.aioe.org:
OMG +1G
news:th6u3m$1vn1$1@gioia.aioe.org:
OMG +1G
S
server
Guest
a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in news:cdf6e5c6-b05b-4f75-831e-
b857bbb00e92n@googlegroups.com:
#fuckoffanddiebrittwit
b857bbb00e92n@googlegroups.com:
#fuckoffanddiebrittwit
S
server
Guest
a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in
news:d9b2be34-79ca-42be-9d87-f03f611c0263n@googlegroups.com:
You are an abject idiot with absolutely no clue how Google, much less
Google Groups works. YOU are fake, motherfucker.
All you are is a high traffic, off topic group troll and nothing
more.
news:d9b2be34-79ca-42be-9d87-f03f611c0263n@googlegroups.com:
You are an abject idiot with absolutely no clue how Google, much less
Google Groups works. YOU are fake, motherfucker.
All you are is a high traffic, off topic group troll and nothing
more.
A
a a
Guest
#shutupstupiddog read:
\"What was DejaNews?
The question is what is DejaNews, but the question really is what was DejaNews. DejaNews began as a site that was dedicated to searching and participating in discussion groups found on Usenet. It later changed its name to Deja.com. This change was due in part to the change of focus from general Usenet searching and discussions to consumer product reviews. With this change they also added an area with information on products, such as product descriptions.
What happened to DejaNews?
The consumer review section of Deja.com was later to be sold. It ended up being sold to eBayâs Half.com. This followed a series of layoffs at the company. After the sale of the consumer review section of Deja.com and some more layoffs, they were bought out completely by the number one search engine Google.
By acquiring Deja.com, Google gets their Usenet search technology. They also acquired the Usenet archive, the Deja.com trademarks, the code and operating systems that operate the Usenet service, and other intellectual property. The archive obtained by Google contained nearly 500 million articles.
If you are still looking for quality access to Usenet, the best place to go is FastUsenet.org. They offer 2 million new articles daily, as well as a wide variety of specialized content servers.
Google Usenet Archive
Whenever you are looking for a certain topic in Usenet and donât know where to find it, the Google archive is a good place to look. Google archives all of the messages that they receive so that when you search for something in a newsgroup you can select the groupsâ page on Google and it will show you the article or articles that the subject can be found in. The Google archive is a great tool that every Fast Usenet member should make use of.
The archives in Google are very large, probably several servers to hold all of the information. The messages posted there are only text, but Fast Usenet alone receives and sends over 2 million articles day. So you can only imagine how much information needs to be stored to keep a good archive. The Google archive also needs space so it can have some level of retention, meaning the amount of time that messages can be searched back to. Some articles can be even found to date back to a couple of years ago, and that is some serious storage.
So next time you want to find a subject and donât know where to begin looking, why not try the Google Archive at www.google.com >> Groups. Then type in your search words into the search field. Google will then search an extensive archive and should return some great matches for your subject.
Related Posts
Jeff Bezos Posts Job Listing on Usenet over 24 Years Ago
https://www.fastusenet.org/blog/what-is-dejanews-where-did-it-go.html
\"What was DejaNews?
The question is what is DejaNews, but the question really is what was DejaNews. DejaNews began as a site that was dedicated to searching and participating in discussion groups found on Usenet. It later changed its name to Deja.com. This change was due in part to the change of focus from general Usenet searching and discussions to consumer product reviews. With this change they also added an area with information on products, such as product descriptions.
What happened to DejaNews?
The consumer review section of Deja.com was later to be sold. It ended up being sold to eBayâs Half.com. This followed a series of layoffs at the company. After the sale of the consumer review section of Deja.com and some more layoffs, they were bought out completely by the number one search engine Google.
By acquiring Deja.com, Google gets their Usenet search technology. They also acquired the Usenet archive, the Deja.com trademarks, the code and operating systems that operate the Usenet service, and other intellectual property. The archive obtained by Google contained nearly 500 million articles.
If you are still looking for quality access to Usenet, the best place to go is FastUsenet.org. They offer 2 million new articles daily, as well as a wide variety of specialized content servers.
Google Usenet Archive
Whenever you are looking for a certain topic in Usenet and donât know where to find it, the Google archive is a good place to look. Google archives all of the messages that they receive so that when you search for something in a newsgroup you can select the groupsâ page on Google and it will show you the article or articles that the subject can be found in. The Google archive is a great tool that every Fast Usenet member should make use of.
The archives in Google are very large, probably several servers to hold all of the information. The messages posted there are only text, but Fast Usenet alone receives and sends over 2 million articles day. So you can only imagine how much information needs to be stored to keep a good archive. The Google archive also needs space so it can have some level of retention, meaning the amount of time that messages can be searched back to. Some articles can be even found to date back to a couple of years ago, and that is some serious storage.
So next time you want to find a subject and donât know where to begin looking, why not try the Google Archive at www.google.com >> Groups. Then type in your search words into the search field. Google will then search an extensive archive and should return some great matches for your subject.
Related Posts
Jeff Bezos Posts Job Listing on Usenet over 24 Years Ago
https://www.fastusenet.org/blog/what-is-dejanews-where-did-it-go.html